Even if you aren’t good looking, chances are bright that you will settle down to wedded bliss if you have a substantial bank account.
IT IS true that love has nothing to do with money but is it true looks matter when it comes on love? A study has been done that provides hard facts to the suggestions that the fairer sex is wan not to a man’s looks, but to his status, power and wealth.
According to historical data from 1909 of more than 30,000 men’s are in short supplies due to events such as wars; women are willing to settle for poorer partners of lesser social sway. However, when men are in profusion, women tend to turn fussy, driving a haggle for the richest and most powerful men. This in turn, has the marriage prospects of poor-off male ‘radically reduced’.
As quoted by Thomas Pollet, “We show that if men are abundant, this will influence the market value of their desired traits, that is, women can demand more. This aspect, namely individual decision making as a function of the mating market (local abundance or scarcity), has been relatively neglected within the literature on human mate choice.”
According to the answers, when the sex ratio is equivalent, married men be inclined to have a little higher socio-economic status than unmarried. “As the sex ratio augments, married men are expected to need up two or three times the socioeconomic status of unmarried men,” he said.
The study gets confirmed on 1991 forecasted by Frank Pedersen of the University of Delaware that the sex percentage has a big impact on the marriage market.
“Thus, much about the varying culture of male and female behaviour across populations and across time could in slandered be clarified with orientation to the sex ratio.” said Pollet.
These questions are mature for future study, but our studies has clearly recognised the more limited fact that sex ratio fluctuations in current humans can put one sex in the driving seat and allow them to drive a hard haggle.
No comments:
Post a Comment